Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5312 (KAR)

SMT.SUSHILA APPASAHEB NAGARALE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/101674/2023 · 2025-03-19

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5019 WP No. 101674 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101674 OF 2023 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SUSHILA APPASAHEB NAGARALE AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. KHADAKLAT, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591 301. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH.I.ZIRALI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATRAJ, M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYAT CHIKODI, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591 201. 3. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KHADAKLAT, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591 228. 4. LAXMAN SATAGOUDA PATIL, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.KHADAKLAT, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591 228. 5. SHAMRAO GANU GHATAGE, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5019 WP No. 101674 of 2023 R/O.KHADAKLAT, TQ. CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591 228. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before the Court on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed on 12.03.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the petition under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on 19.03.2025. The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5019 WP No. 101674 of 2023 order dated 12.03.2025, the petition is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27