- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12835-DB CCC No. 100295 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100295 OF 2025 BETWEEN: IRAPPA S/O. TIPPANNA BAVOOR @ KUMBAR AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. AT GADDANAKERI, TALUK AND DISTRICT. BAGALKOT-587101. …COMPLAINANT (BY MISS. GAYATRI S.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. D. BASAVARAJ, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BAGALKOT-587103. 2. NAVEEN PRASAD KATTIMANI THE REHABILITATION OFFICER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BAGALKOT-587103. …ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SANJAY CHANAL, ADVOCATE FOR A2; SRI. PRAVEEN UPPAR, AGA FOR PROFORMA RESPONDENT) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1950, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE CONTEMPT PETITION AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER DATED 27.01.2025, PASSED IN W.P.NO.106658/2024 (LB-RES), PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AND PASS SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12835-DB CCC No. 100295 of 2025 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) This contempt petition is filed alleging the disobedience of the order dated 27.01.2025 passed in WP No.106658/2024. The operative portion of the order of the learned Single Judge reads as under; “i) The writ petition is allowed. ii) A mandamus is issued directing respondents No.1 and 2 to issue necessary Hakkupatra in terms of the intimation letter dated 04.09.2024 and the resolution dated 06.11.2015, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.” 2. Learned counsel Sri.Sunil Chanal appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed a memo along with the documents. The document enclosed along with the memo is the Hakkupatra issued in favour of the complainant. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12835-DB CCC No. 100295 of 2025 3. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that pursuant to the Hakkupatra, the authority is required to execute a registered lease cum sale agreement. 4. In response, learned counsel Sri.Sunil Chanal submits that the further steps for registration of the document would be taken within a period of three weeks. 5. In view of the said submission, the present contempt petition is closed with a liberty to the complainant to revive the contempt proceedings, if the undertaking is not adhered to. 6. Learned counsel Smt. Gayatri S.R., submits that the original Hakkupatra produced by the authority is received by her and she would hand over the same to the complainant. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE PJ, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 35