Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP Nos. 806 & 834/2025
Decided on: 10.01.2025
1.
CWP No. 806/2025 Vinay Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents. 2 CWP No. 834/2025 Rohit Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Rocky, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Navlesh , Advocate vice Mr. Hamender Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Navlesh, learned vice counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and 3, respectively.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the legal issue involved in these case has already been adjudicated 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
upon; Petitioners have filed representations dated 01.10.2024 (Annexure P-3), for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petition, but till date the same have not been adjudicated upon; Petitioners would be satisfied in case competent authority is directed to decide the said representations in accordance with law within a time bound schedule. The above is not objected to by learned Additional Advocate General.
3. In view of the above, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 10th January 2025(rohit)