Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 53101 (BOM)
GULAB S/O CHANDUJI NAITAM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PSO, SEWAGRAM, DIST. WARDHA AND ANR.
BA/824/2025 · 2025-09-20
Vrushali V Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53101 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53101 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 13.ba.824.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 824/2025 Gulab s/o. Chanduji Naitam Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. M. V. Rai, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms T. H. Udeshi, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State. Ms Bhavya C. Dhruv, Advocate (Appointed) for Non-applicant No.2.
CORAM : MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,J.
DATED : 20/09/2025. . After hearing the matter for some time, when this Court has shown its disinclination to grant bail, the
learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application.
2. The application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
3. The fees of the appointed Counsel be quantified as per Rules.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) RGurnule 2025:BHC-NAG:9443