APHC010604602023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31257/2023 Between: M SRINIVASULU, , S/O. M. PEDDA CHENDRAYUDU, AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 19-1-23/R24, CHINTALACHENU WARD, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS. PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, EAST POLICE STATION, RTC BUS STAND, 0PP. PGR THEATRE, TIRUPATI. 4. N PADMAVATHI PADMAJA REDDY, , W/O. N. PRURSHOTHAM REDDY, AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 5-54, BHARATHAM MITTA, PAKALA, CHITTOR DISTRICT. AADHAR NO. 4718 6743 1475 5. N SACHIN PRIYATHAM REDDY, S/O. N. PRURSHOTHAM REDDY, AGE 27 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. 5-54, BHARATHAM MITTA, PAKALA, CHITTOR DISTRICT. AADHAR NO. 3691 8441 2587 6. N NITHIN REDDY, S/O. N. PRURSHOTHAM REDDY, AGE 25 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. 5-54, BHARATHAM MITTA, PAKALA, CHITTOR DISTRICT. AADHAR NO. 3691 8441 2587 7. K NEHA, . D/O. K. NARASIMHA REDDY, AGE 26 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. 2-21, C RAMAPURAM, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI-517 561. 44 8. K SREERAM, S/O. K. PRAVEEN KUMAR, AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, 1 R/O. PLOT NO. 215, RADHEYSHYAM APARTMENT, AKKARAMPALLI ROAD, TIRUPATI-517501. AADHAR NO. 6324 5836 0495. 9. M LATHA, W/O. SRINIVASULU, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 19-L-23/R24, VILLA NO. 24, TEMPLE TOWN, CHINTHALACHENU, TIRUPATI-517 501. 10. G S ROOP TEJA, S/O. G S JYOTHI PRASAD, AGE. 28 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 18-18-1083, MARUTHI NAGAR, KORALAGUNTA, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- 517 501, AADHAR NO. 4361 5408 7310 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. S BALA MOHAN RANGA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent nos.2 and 3 in not registering the FIR against the Respondent nos.4 and 10 basing on complaint dt. 03-04-2023, is illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice, violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and violation of the Judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.Lalitha Kumari Vs. Union of India and also the Judgment of this Hon'ble Court in the case of TVG.Chandra Sekhar Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and consequently direct the Respondent nos.2 and 3, to register FIR against the Respondent nos. 4 and 10 basing on complaint dt. 03-04-2023.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, since the contents of the complaint given by the Petitioner show that the matter is of civil nature, the Police have not registered any case based on the said complaint. 3. Sri S.Bala Mohan Ranga, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31257 of 2023 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh