SANJEEV S/O SIDDAPPA KAMBLE v. THE KARNATAKA INFORMATION COMMISSION
WP/102702/2025 · 2025-11-18
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53085 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53085 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15815 WP No. 102702 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102702 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SANJEEV S/O. SIDDAPPA KAMBLE, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRI., R/O: TELASANG VILLAGE, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI – 591 265. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA A. PUROHIT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE KARNATAKA INFORMATION COMMISSION, REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY, MAHITI SOUDHA, D. DEVARAJ URS ROAD, OPP VIDHAN SOUDHA WESTERN GATE -2, BENGALURU -01.
2.
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER/AEE, PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING SUB –DIVISION, RAIBAG, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELAGAVI – 591 317.
3.
THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY/ EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEEERING DIVISION OFFICE, CHIKKODI, TQ: CHIKKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI - 591 201, AND OTHERS AS SHOWN IN ANNEXURE A TO N. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, SET ASIDE THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1, DATED 31-10-2023, VIDE CASE NO.KIC/20743/APL/2022 C/W CASES AS SHOWN IN ANNEXURE-A TO N, VIDE ANNEXURE-C IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF THE MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO FURNISH INFORMATION AS SOUGHT BY THE PETITIONER IN ANNEXURE-A TO N IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,
Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15815 WP No. 102702 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.
2. In terms of the memo so filed, petition is
disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
RHR/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29