APHC010642902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3686/2025 Between: 1. B VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O B.UTTANNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O., D.NO.129 MADANAPALLI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI M ADHISHIKTH KISHORE, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, APIIC, HEAD OFFICE, MANGALGIRI, AMARAVATI. 2. MR SRINIVAS MURTHY, ZONAL MANAGER THE ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED, ZONAL MANAGER, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, KADAPA. 3. SMT YASMIN BHANU, DEPUTY ZONAL MANAGER (AM) AND COMMISSIONER APIIC-IALA-MADANAPALLE, ANAMMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. MR PONNAM REDDY JAYA NARAYANA REDDY, S/O., RAMI REDDY, MANAGING PARTNER, JNR AUTOMOBILES, PLOT NO. E-7, INDUSTRIAL PARK, MADANAPALLI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517325. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful violation of the statement given before this Honble Court on 07.06.2025 in WP.No. 10428 of 2025, and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with filling of the order dated 17.06.2025 passed in W.P. No. 10428 of 2025 before this hon’ble High Court, pending disposal of the Contempt before this hon’ble court. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case has been filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 17.06.2025, passed in W.P.No.10428 of 2025. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the action of the official respondents in not initiating legal action against the unofficial respondent regarding constructions in Plot No.E7 in Industrial Park, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, without obtaining necessary permission, as illegal and arbitrary. 4. When the writ petition was listed on 17.06.2025, learned Standing Counsel submitted that a stop work order was issued to the unofficial respondent on 05.06.2025, and the unofficial respondent had stopped the construction, and to that effect, photographs were also filed and the same was recorded. At the request of learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5 to file a counter-affidavit, the writ petition was adjourned. Page 3 of 4 5. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner in the contempt case is that the respondent authorities are disobeying the undertaking given and thus, violated the order dated 17.06.2025. 6. If any interim order was passed by this Court, this Court will record the submissions made by learned counsel. However, the contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioner regarding disobeying the undertaking given would not amount to any contempt, and thus, this Court does not find any violation of the order dated 17.06.2025, passed in W.P.No.10428 of 2025. 7. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 28.11.2025 TVN 504 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.3686 OF 2025 Date: 28.11.2025 TVN