BALAJI VITTHAL ANJANWAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
CA/652/2025 · 2025-01-17
Shri S G Mehare, Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5308 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5308 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ca 652.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 652 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6432 OF 2024 Balaji Vitthal Anjanwad .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Chandrakant R. Thorat, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 3.
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 17TH JANUARY, 2025.
ORDER : . Heard learned counsel for respective parties. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay stands condoned and writ petition is restored to its original position on the voluntary declaration of deposit of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousands only) with the Registry of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad for the purpose of High Court Dispensary. Office objections be removed within six (06) weeks from today, if not removed already.
[SHAILESH P. BRAHME J.] [S. G. MEHARE, J.] bsb/Jan. 25 2025:BHC-AUG:1585-DB