APHC010184092019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7917/2019 Between: 1. A. SADA SIVA RAO, S/O.LATE A. NARASMIHA RAO, AGED 76 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, 4-333, GUTTURU, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. A. SARALA BAI, W/O. A SADASIVA RAO, AGED 69 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, 4-33-B, GUTTURU, PENAKONDA, MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 515164. 3. A. VIJAY KUMAR RAO,, S/O. A. SADA SIVA RAO, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC NETWORK ENGINEER, 4/33B, MAIN ROAD, GUTTURU, PENUGONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KIA INDUSTRIAL AREA POLICE STATION, AMMAVARI PALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 2 4. MR P SUDHAKAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, OCC WORKING AS SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KIA INDUSTRIAL AREA POLICE STATION, AMMAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, PENDUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 5. SANEPALLI SATHYANARAYANA, S/O. S.GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC RATION SHOP DEALER CUM MEDIATOR ,MUNIMADUGURU VILLAGE, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 6. NAGARAJU, , S/O. CHINNAKATAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, GUTTURU VILLAGE, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAMANA ALLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7917 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularity one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd Respondent not to interfere in civil dispute of the petitioners by way of misusing white blank papers and bond papers to do undue favour to 5th and 6th Respondents subsequently direct the 1 to 3 Respondents to protect the fundamental rights of the petitioners in the interest of justice by declaring the arbitrary action of the official respondents is being illegal, highhanded and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass…” 2. Ms.S.Sravana Sandhya, learned counsel representing Sri Ramana Allu, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this matter is civil in nature. In that view of the matter, cause does not survive for further adjudication, and the writ petition may be closed. 3. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioners, the writ petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 15.10.2025 Dmr 4 127 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:7917 OF 2019 Date: 15.10.2025 Dmr