IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE iPRESENT: TM^IhONOURABLE dr justice Y. LAKSHMANA RAO ^ CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9111 OF 2025 A r.‘ : <: v*?' i''A Y-1 Y' Between: 1. Korra Rajubabu, S/o. Ramarao, aged about 24 years, R/o. Diguva Janabha Village, Balapam Panchayat, Chintapalli Mandal, Alluri Sitharama Raju District, A.P. 2. Paltasingi Sandeep, S/o. Ravi Kumar, aged about 24 years, R/o. Kokkirapalli Village, G. Madugula Mandal, Alluri Sitharama Raju District A.P. 3. Ullangi Poul Raju, S/o. Rambabu, aged about 20 years, R/o. Kokkirapalli Village, G. Madugula Mandal, Alluri Sitharama Raju District A.P. j j 4. Mori Lovaraju, S/o. Kondababu, aged about 24 years, R/o. Somavaram Village, A. Annavaram Panchayat, Chintapalli Mandal, Alluri Sitharama Raju District, A.P. Petitioners/Accused No.2, 3, 6 & 7 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C/ 480 & 483 of BNSS., is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the CriminalPetition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused No.2, 3, 6, 7 on bail pending disposal of Crime No. 14/2025 of Koyyuru P.S., Alluri Sitharama Raju District. / The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioners and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent; The Court made the following ORDER: 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This criminal petition has been filed, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to enlarge the petitioners- accused Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 7 on bail in crime No. 14 of 2025 of Koyyuru Police Station, Alluri Sitharama Raju District, registered for the offences punishable under Section 111 (2) (b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 20 (b) (ii) (C) and 25 read with Section 8 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, on the allegation of the petitioners- accused Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 7 had indulged in dealing with 173 K.Gs.of Ganja. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners-accused Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 7 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. The allegation against the petitioners-accused Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 7 is that they had indulged in dealing with 173 K.Gs. of Ganja. It is a commercial quantity. The petitioners were arrested on 15-04-2025. They have been in judicial custody for the past 183 days. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed within 180 days. NDPS Sessions Case number is awaited. 3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that against the petitioner-accused No. 3, one NDPS case is pending and against accused No. 7, two NDPS cases are pending. 3 In view of similar cases pending against the petitioners-accused Nos. 3 4. and 7 and charge sheet was filed within 180 days of their remand, this Court is not inclined to enlarge them on bail. Hence, the petition against the petitioners-accused Nos. 3 and 7 is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and 5. gravity of allegations levelled against the petitioners-accused Nos. 2 and 6 this Court is inclined to enlarge them on bail with the following stringent conditions; The petitioners-accused Nos. 2 and 6 shall be enlarged on bail (i) subject to their executing each a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial I Class Magistrate, Chintapalli; The petitioners-accused Nos. 2 and 6 shall not cause any (ii) threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses: The petitioners-accused Nos. 2 and 6 shall surrender their (iii) passports, if any, to the investigating officer. If they claim that they do not have passports, they shall submit affidavits to that effect to the Investigating Officer; and The petitioners-accused Nos. 2 and 6 shall not leave the (iv) limits of State of Andhra Pradesh without the express permission from the Station House Officer concerned. 4 The criminal petition is accordingly partly allowed. 6. SDI- K. KASiRAO ACHAR! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTON OFFICER To, 1. The I Additional District & Sessions Judge-Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chintapalli. 3. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Station House Officer, Koyyuru P.S., Alluri Sitharama Raju District. 5. One CC to Sri. GOLI_APALLI MAHESWARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. [OUT] 7. One spare copy JSS HIGH COURT DR.YLR, J DATED: 14/10/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.9111 of 2025 • r PARTLY ALLOWED