Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53063 (AP)

Dasari Saraswathi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/10057/2025 · 2025-10-02

Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010512732025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10057 OF 2025 Between: 1. Dasari Saraswathi, W/o. Dasari Prabhakar, Aged about 25 years, Occ. Cultivation, Residing at D.No. 2-45, Iruvendula (V), Singanamala (M), Anantapur District. 2. D. Gangarathnamma, W/o. Late D. Pullaiah, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Cultivation, Residing at D.No. 2-45, Iruvendula (V), Singanamala (M), Anantapur District. (AS) (A9) ...Petitioners/Accused No. 8 and 9 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...Respondent Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C Old Section under Section 482 of the BNSS of 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the Petitioners/Accused No. 8 and 9 on bail in the event of their arrest pursuant to Crime No. 70 of 2025 of Singanamala Police Station. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI O. UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010512732025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] FRIDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10057/2025 Between: 1.DASARI SARASWATHI, W/0 DASARI PRABHAKAR.AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION,RESIDING AT D.NO. 2-45, IRUVENDULA V,SINGANAMALA M, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. GANGARATHNAMMA, W/0 LATE D. PULLAIAH,AGED ABOUT 52 AT D.NO. 2-45, 2.D CULTIVATION,RESIDING OCC YEARS, IRUVENDULA V,SINGANAMALA M, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.A9.. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND Rep. by its Public 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS Petition under praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the Petitioners/Accused No. 8 and 9 on bail in the event of her arrest pursuant to Crime No. 70 of 2025 of Singanamala Police Station Counsel for the Petltioner/accused(S): 1.0 UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant; 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri O.Udaya Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, this Criminal Petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, House Officer, Singanamala Police Station. 1. The Station SRI. O. UDAYA KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at 2. OneCCto 3. Two CCS to PUBLIC Amaravati. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies Chp vna CHP VACATION COURT HIGH COURT DATED:03/10/2025 ORDER CRLP NO. 10057 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS