Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010482202025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 24468/2025 Between:
1. VENNA BHULAKSHMI, W/O. VENKATAREDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, M.R.O OFFICE BACK SIDE,7-667/1A, PO. PIDUGURALLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME),
STATE SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANAGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARSARAOPET.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PIDUGURALLA POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an order or direction or a Writ, more particularly a Writ in the Nature of Habeas Corpus and direct the Respondents to produce
the petitioner's son, Venna Rashekar Reddy, before this Hon'ble Court and direct appropriate action/disciplinary proceedings against the station house officer of piduguralla police station for repeated indulgence in illegal arrests and abuse of power and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
2. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenue has been produced before the Magistrate and has been detained on judicial custody.
2. As there is an order of remand, passed by the learned Magistate, it would be appropriate to close this Writ Petition, leaving it open to the petitioner/detenue to avail of their rights before the Magistrate.
3. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
Date: 22.09.2025 MJA
565
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 24468 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
22.09.2025
MJA