IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: » HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO ; CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11697 OF 2025 Between: 1. Chinnarasu Venkatesan S/o Venkatesan Armughamjhattapara Village, Gudiyatham Taluq, Vellore District, TamilNadu State. 2. G Bhubalan, S/o D. Govindaswamy, Machinur Village,Gudiyatham Taluq, Vellore District, Tamil Nadu State. Petitioner/Accused-2 & 3 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati through FRO Palamaner Range. Respondent/Compiainant Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, (New Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023) is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant bail to the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 & 3in OR. No. 41/2025-26, PalamanerRange, Chittoor District, registered for the offences U/s 20(1) (C) (ii) (iii) (iv) (vi) and (x) of A.P. Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016, Section 20(1)(d)(i) of the Andhra Pradesh Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016, Sec. 62 of A.P. Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016, Rule 3 (1) of A.P. Sandal wood and Red Sanders wood transit Rules, 1969 and U/s. 303 (2) read with 3(5) BNS 49, 61 (2) BNS Act, 2023, COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: SRI. SRINIVASU L COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER 2 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.ll697 of 2025 Dated 24.11.2025 The Cpurt made the following: & e** ■' QRDEt: \ The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 3 on bail in OR.No.41/2-25-26 of FRO, Palamaner Range, Chittoor District for the offences under Sections 20(1) (C) (ii) (iii) (iv) (vi) and (x) of Andhra Pradesh Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016, Section 20(1)(d)(i) of the Andhra Pradesh Forest (Amendment) Act, 2016, Rule 3(1) of A.P.Sandal wood and Red Sanders Wood Transit Rules, 1969 and Under Section 303(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNS’) and Sections 49 and 61 (2) of ‘the BNS’. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the petitioners are innocent; they were falsely implicated in this case. They have not committed any offence. They are the sole breadwinners of their families. They are the permanent residents of Gudiyatham Taluq, Vellore District, Tamil Nadu State, and have a fixed abode. If they are h enlarged on'bail on any conditions, they may comply with them, and it is urged to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 3 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.ll697 of 2025 Dated 24.11.2025 3. Per contra, Ms. P. Akhila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, submits that the petitioners are habitual offenders; however, there is no record available about their previous offences. Investigation is pending, and some more witnesses are yet to be examined. Hence, it is urged to dismiss the petition. 4. On perusal of the record, the petitioners were arrested on 08.10.2025, when they were allegedly transporting 61.00 Kgs of Red Sander wood in two logs. They have been in judicial custody for the past 47 days. It is the case of the prosecution that Petitioner No.2/Accused No.3 5. is the friend of Accused No.1. Petitioner No. 1/Accused No.2 acted as mediator, and he engaged Petitioner No.2/Accused No.3 for the transportation of two logs of red sender wood. Considering the gravity and nature of the allegations leveled 6. against Petitioner No.1/Accused No.2, this Court is inclined to dismiss the petition. Accordingly, the petition against Petitioner No.1/Accused No.2 is dismissed. However, Petitioner No.2/Accused No.3 acted as the driver of the 7. vehicle in which two logs of contraband were transported. Considering the nature of the allegations, which are milder, and the lesser gravity of 4 Dr. YLR, J CrI. P. No. 11697 of 2025 ^ Dated 24.11.2025 the allegations against Petitioner No.2/Accused No.3, this Court is inclined to enlarge Petitioner No.2/Accused No.3 on bail. 8. In the result, the Criminal Petition is partly allowed with the following conditions; The petitioner No.2/Accused Nos.3 shall be enlarged on bail subject to him executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of I. the learned Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Trial of Cases relating to Red Sanders Smuggling, Tirupati. ii. The petitioner No.2/Accused Nos.3 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till filing of the charge sheet. The petitioner No.2/Accused Nos.3 shall not leave Ml. the limits of the District without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned. The petitioner No.2/Accused Nos.3 shall not commit IV. or indulge in commission of any offence ip future. 5 Dr. YLR, J Crt.P.No.ll697 of 2025 Dated 24.11.2025 The petitioner No.2/Accused Nos.3 shall cooperate with the investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall make himself available for V. interrogation by the investigating officer as and when required, vi. The petitioner No.2/Accused Nos.3 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. SD/-B.CHITTI JOSEPH DEPUTYj.REGISTRAR tion officer //TRUE COPY// For SE To, 1. The Junior Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Trial of cases relating to Red Sanders Smuggling, Tirupati 2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Tirupati 3. The Station House officer, FRO Palamaner Range. 4. One CC to SRI. SRINIVASU L Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.PfOUT] 6. One spare copy HIGH COURT DR.YLR.J DATED:24/11/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.11697 of 2025 ALLOWED