APHC010631932022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37821/2022 Between: 1. TANNERU SUNIL KUMAR, S/O.CHENCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC-REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, R/O.DOOR NO.4-67, OPP. GUESTLINE HOTEL, BANK EMPLOYEES COLONY, AKKARAMPALLI, TIRUPATI TOWN AND MANDAL, PRESENTLY TIRUPATI DISTRICT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANANTHAPUR RANGE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRESENTLY TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GAJULAMANDYAM POLICE STATION, RENIGUNTA, PRESENTLY TIRUPATI DISTRICT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. AROHARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC- CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GAJULAMANDYAM POLICE STATION, RENIGUNTA, PRESENTLY THIRUPATI DISTRICT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. DHARMA REDDY, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC- SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 2 GAJULAMANDYAM POLICE STATION, RENIGUNTA, PRESENTLY TIRUPATI DISTRICT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. RAMA CHANDRA, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC-D.S.P., 0/O. D.S.P. OFFICE, RENIGUNTA, PRESENTLY TIRUPATI DISTRICT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. KUNDURU KIRAN KUMAR RAJU, S/O.K. PULLAM RAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.6-8-1234, NG0'S COLONY, K.T. ROAD, TIRUPATI TOWN, PRESENTLY TIRUPATI DISTRICT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. SIVA PRASAD, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O.D.NO.4-12-28, NEAR POLICE STATION, RAJAMPET, PRESENTLY ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the high handed action of the 4th to 7th respondents for harassing and threatening the petitioner and involving in the civil matter without any jurisdiction by misusing their official powers is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violate of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conduct a department enquiry against the 51h to 7th respondents as per G.O.Ms.No.288 / 2010, dated 06-11-2010 and take appropriate departmental action basing on the departmental enquiry as per G.O.Ms.No.288 / 2010, dated 06-11-2010 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th to 7th respondents not to involving in civil matters and not to summon the petitioner to the 4th respondent police station on the guise of the civil settlement with the 8th and 9th respondents, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 3 1. G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37821 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the high handed action of the 4th to 7th respondents for harassing and threatening the petitioner and involving in the civil matter without any jurisdiction by misusing their official powers is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violate of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conduct a department enquiry against the 51h to 7th respondents as per G.O.Ms.No.288 /2010, dated 06-11-2010 and take appropriate departmental action basing on the departmental enquiry as per G.O.Ms.No.288 / 2010, dated 06- 11-2010 and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.11.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.37821 of 2022 Dated.07.11.2025 UPS 237