Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53035 (AP)

KatamVeerabramhaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11601/2021 · 2025-09-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010203102021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11601/2021 Between: 1. KATAMVEERABRAMHAIAH,, S/O. K. VEERASWAMY, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC- CLOTH MERCHANT, R/O. D.NO.12/86, VANAMVEEDHI, CHENNURU, CHENNURU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALLURU POLICE STATION, VALLURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KATA SAMBASIVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11601 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of respondents 3 and 4 in harassing the petitioner and calling to the Police Station and making threats to the entire family as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to make any threats or direct the petitioner to come to offices of respondents 3 and 4 and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri Kata Sambasiva Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent police are calling the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against him. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 dated 22.06.2021, the respondent police are not calling the petitioner to the police station. 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station in absence 4 of any crime registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.09.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.11601 of 2021 Dated.19.09.2025 UPS 600