[2025:RJ-JP:4831] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1733/2025 Shri Jamuvay Suppliers, Through Its Proprietor Pooja Shekhawat Daughter Of Shri Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, Resident Of 278, Surya Nagar, Mahesh Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Chairman Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Limited, (Appellate Authority), Near Gandhi Nagar, Railway Station, Jaipur. 2. Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Near Gandhi Nagar, Railway Station, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vimal Choudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Tailor For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arpit Srivastava for Mr. Achintya Kaushik HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 04/02/2025 1. Petitioner has preferred instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, raising a grievance of not deciding his appeal preferred on 18.01.2025, against the rejection of technical bid on 09.01.2025 in respect of Tender ID 2024_JZDUS_431254_1 dated 14.11.2024. 2. Counsel for the petitioner vehemently submits that the petitioner submitted lowest bid yet his bid has been rejected on technical reasons in order to favour another bidder whereagainst petitioner has preferred appeal. The appellate authority viz. Chairman Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh is not [2025:RJ-JP:4831] (2 of 2) [CW-1733/2025] hearing the appeal and stay application and in the meanwhile, during the course of appeal, the financial bid may be finalized, which would lead to failure of justice. 3. Counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondents and submits that if the appeal/ stay application filed by the petitioner, against rejection of his technical bid dated 09.01.2025, has not been considered and decided yet, the same shall be considered and decided forthwith in accordance with law. 4. Considering the grievance of petitioner and the statement of counsel for the respondents, it is hereby observed that the appellate authority viz. Chairman Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh shall hear and decide the appeal itself expeditiously on merits. If the hearing of appeal is not possible, then shall consider and pass appropriate order on the stay application of petitioner, at least within a period of 10 days from receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/10