APHC010285552024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14303/2024 Between: 1. YERRAPPAGARI MAHIPAL REDDY, S/O Y.SUBBA REDDY AGED 25 YEARS, OCCUPATION PRIVATE, R/O 10-88-7-1 RAVINDRA NAGAR, EGUVA KURUVANKA MADANAPALLE ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, (OLD CHITTOOR DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAYACHOTI 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, MADANAPALLE 4. THE S H O, , MADANAPALLE TALUKU P.S. 5. Y ASWANI, W/O SUBBA REDDY, AGED 35 YEARS, RAVINDRA NAGAR, EGUVA KURUVANKA MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 who failed to initiate action on my reports dated 27.06.2024 and 01.07.2024 given to the respondent No.2 which was forwarded to the respondent 3 as being illegal, irregular and amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on the respondents under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, or under the provisions of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and in violation of Article14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to register a crime against the 5th respondent and others and investigate in the interest of Justice and pass...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 ASR 188 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14303 of 2024 Dt.22.11.2025 ASR