APHC010536832024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27911 OF 2024 Between: 1. GOLLA LAXMIDEVI, W/o Maddileti, aged about 57 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o.H.No 4-333, Baireddy Nagar, Damagatia Village, Nandi Kotkur Mandal, Nandyal District, AP. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home, Department, Amaravathi. 2. The Director General of Police DGP, Andhra Pradesh, At Amaravathi. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police DIG, Kurnool Range, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Superintendent of Police SP, Nandyal, Nandyal, District. 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police DSP, Athmakur, Nandyal, District. 6. The Station House Officer SHO, Brahmanakotkur, Nandyal, District. 7. Ramanjaneyulu Nayak, S/o. Not known, aged about 55 years, Occ. DSP Athmakur, Athmakur, Nandyal District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS By declaring the in action of the respondent no.2 to 6 not taking any action and not registering FIR on the complaint dt.29.10.2024 and 11.11.2024 which was given by the petitioner against the 1. Badikela Sirisha, 2. Badikela Laxmidevi, 3. Linganna, 4. Badikela Suresh, S.Gopi, 6. Sathyalu, is illegal arbitrary, and violation of Provisions of the BNSS as well as Honble Apex Court Judgment of Lalitha Kumari and Consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to take action against the 7th respondent who threatening the petitioner to settle the issue with the accused persons and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to 6 to take action on the complaint dt. 29.10.2024 and 11.11.2024 register an FIR and investigate the matter against the accused persons in the complaint and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: A MOGILI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27911 OF 2024 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “….Pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS By declaring the in action of the respondent no.2 to 6 not taking any action and not registering FIR on the complaint dt.29.10.2024 and 11.11.2024 which was given by the petitioner against the 1. Badikela Sirisha, 2. Badikela Laxmidevi, 3. Linganna, 4. Badikela Suresh, 5.Gopi, 6. Sathyalu, is illegal arbitrary, and violation of Provisions of the BNSS as well as Honble Apex Court Judgment of Lalitha Kumari and Consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to take action against the 7th respondent who threatening the petitioner to settle the issue with the accused persons and pass such other orders...” 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on oral instructions, submits that based on the contents in the complaint made by the petitioner, it is found that the matter is civil in nature. He further submits that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Recording the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.12.2025 Ksj