' \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 26644 OF 2nn/^ AMARAVATI Between: AVenkataramanappa, S/o. Chennaiah Executive, 0/o.The District Manager, A.P.MARKFED, Ongoie, Prakasam District. Aged 56 years, Occ; Junior ...PETITIONER AND 1. The A.P. State Coop Marketing Federation Ltd., 2. The A.P. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Managing Director, 5-9-58/B, 7*' Floor, Parisram Hyderabad. Rep by its Chairman. Ltd., Rep by its Bhavan, Basheerbagh ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arficie 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the 2"” respondent iri awarding the punishment of reduction may more particularly one in the of pay equivalent to (30 grade years by Proceedings Rc.No. increments for a period of two HRD/MIS/KMM/2001 dated. 23-02-2005 appeal by the 1 dated. 16-09-2005 and the consequential rejection of respondent in Proceedings Rc.No.HDR/7609/2001 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of consequently set aside the said proceedings. ' the Constitution of India and 2^ LA. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 34247 OF 2nnfi) Petition under Section 151 ,CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings Rc.No. HRD/MIS/KMM/ 2001 dated 23-02-2005 issued by the 2^^^ respondent and the consequential rejection of appeal by proceedings Rc.No. HDR/7609 /2001 dated 16-09-2005 issued by the 1®* respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI L. V. S. NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: M/s. Y. MAHA LAKSHMI The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010099642005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] sfe; THURSDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT \ I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 26644/2005 Between: A.venkataramanappa, Prakasam District. ...PETITIONER AND The A P State Coop Marketing Federation Ltd 1 and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.LVS NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.P VIJAYA KUMARI 2.Y MAHA LAKSHMI The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.04.2025 and 24.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioner and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today. 2. there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3- Accordingly, the Writ Petition shall be no order is dismissed for ^on-prosecution. There as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. \ // REGISTRAR Sa/- P VINOD KUMAR ASSISTAj^T REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, SEC 1. One CC to Sri L. V. S. Nagaraju, Advocate [OPUC] e CC to M/s. Y. Maha Lakshmi, Advocate [OPUCl 3. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 \ ORDER WP.No.26644 of 2005 0 8 SEP 2025 o'; rrt, Co DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS