GORIPARTHI SRINIVASA RAO v. GORIPARTHI VENKATESWARA RAO
CRP/239/2024 · 2025-12-18
V Sujatha
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53010 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53010 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010015372024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 239/2024 Between:
1. GORIPARTHI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED 48 YEARS. AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.4-52, POTHUNURU, DENDULURU MANDAL.
...PETITIONER AND
1. GORIPARTHI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O RAMULU, HINDU, MALE, AGED 79 YEARS. AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.4-52, POTHUNURU, DENDULURU MANDAL.
2. GORIPARTHI DURGA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED 37 YEARS. AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.4-52, POTHUNURU, DENDULURU MANDAL.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the order, dated 06.12.2023 (Sixth day of December Two Thousand Twenty Three) in I.A.No.971/2023 in O.S.No.265/2017, on the file of Hon’ble Additional Senior Civil Judges Court, Eluru, W.G. District, dismissing the amendment petition filed by petitioner/plaintiff and thus allow the I.A.No.971/2023 in OS.No.265/2017 and pass
2 VS,J CRP.No.239 of 2024 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all father proceedings in O.S.No.265/2017, on the file of Hon’ble Additional Senior Civil Judges’ Court, Eluru, W.G. District, pending disposal of the main C.R.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C VENKAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M KISHORE BABU
3 VS,J CRP.No.239 of 2024 The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Y. Seetharamanjaneyulu,
learned Counsel representing Ch. Venkaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 19.12.2025 JLSR/SA