Geddam Vijaya kumara v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/28703/2021 · 2025-10-13
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53009 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53009 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010468172021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION No. 28703/2021 Between:
1. GEDDAM VIJAYA KUMARA, W/O.NAGESWARARARAO, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O.9-122/2, CHEEKURUMELLIVARIPETA, AMBEDKARVIGRAHAM, PALLAMKURRU, EAST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH-533212.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A. P.
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in not acting in accordance with procedure contemplated under section 154(3) Criminal Procedure Code is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violations of Articles 14,16,19 and 3oo-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No 2 to consider the substance of information submitted dated 27.09.2021 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to act in accordance with the procedure contemplated u/s 154 (3) of Cr.P.C and pass order or orders in accordance with law, pending disposal of the writ petition may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner seeking the following relief:
“... to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in not acting in accordance with procedure contemplated under section 154(3) Criminal Procedure Code is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violations of Articles 14,16,19 and 3oo-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No 2 to consider the substance of information submitted dated 27.09.2021 and pass ....”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that basing on the statement recorded from the victim by the Head Constable of Katrenikonda Police, a case in Crime NO.150 of 2021 was registered against the son of the Petitioner (Chandrasekhar) for the offence punishable under Section 324 IPC. During the course of investigation, the Station House Officer served a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. to the son of the Petitioner and would submit that investigation is pending awaiting the would certificate of the victim. Further, there are civil disputes pending between the parties and respondent Police never interfered in those disputes.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this writ petition may be disposed of.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 28703 of 2021
14.10.2025
Mjl /* s