Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 14643 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No. 14643 of 2025
1. M.Yogaraj S/o.B.Vijayalakshmi, No.150, C-block, 7th Floor, Tnscb Quarters, Vallisewaren Garden, R A Puram, Chennai-600 028. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Tahsildar Mylapore Taluk, No.28, Greenways Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai- 600 028. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr. Anirudh A Sriram For Respondent: Mr.R.Neelakandan, AAG-VIII Assisted by Mr.S.Balamurugan, GA ORDER The matter was listed under the caption ''for being mentioned'' at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, on the ground that different views are taken in the order dated 24.04.2025, which is factually erroneous. However, today, the order in W.P.(MD).No.22526 of 2024 passed by this Court dated 24.09.2024, is also produced by the learned Additional Advocate General before this Court where a different view has been taken. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 14643 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. rli
2. Therefore, I am of the view that nothing further can be done in the present writ petition under the caption for being mentioned leaving it open for the petitioner to exhaust his remedy in the manner known to law. Hence, no further order is necessary in this writ petition and the same is clarified. 23-06-2025 Rli To The Tahsildar Mylapore Taluk, No.28, Greenways Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai- 600 028. WP No. 14643 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 14643 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis