CWP- 12691-2025 -1- 123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- 12691-2025 Date of Decision: 06.05.2025 RITIKA SHARMA ..... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Yash Dev Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release arrears of salary due to pay hike in a time bound manner, in view of judgment dated 30.09.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-14904-2024 titled Dr. Dusyant and others v. State of Haryana and another. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case she is permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, and the same may be ordered to be decided within a Seema 2025.05.08 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP- 12691-2025 -2- specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State, and submits that in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks, the same will be decided by the second respondent-Director General, Higher Education, by passing a speaking/reasoned order thereupon in accordance with law, within a period of three months of receiving the representation. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ₹ officer concerned shall pay costs of 50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 06.05.2025 JUDGE Sima Sima Sima Sima Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Seema 2025.05.08 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document