APHC010401302019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 19261/2019 Between: 1. SINGARI SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. VENKAIAH, AGE 42 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, H.NO.120/2, RAMALAKSHMANA VEEDHI, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH.AT AMARAVATI, 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARKAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 5. NATUKULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, R/O. H.NO.7-662-27J, SIVAJINAGAR, 8TH LINE, MARKAPURAM, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondent No.2 in not entrusting the crimes in F.I.R. No(s).149 and 150 of 2019 of Markapuram Town Police Station, Prakasham District to the Crime Investigation Department is arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to entrust the crimes in 2 F.I.R.No(s).149 and 150 of 2019 of Markapuram Town Police Station, Prakasham District IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to pass orders on the representation dated 21-09-2019 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SESIBUSHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.19261 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri G. Ratna Kumnar, learned counsel representing Sri B. Sasibushan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing respondent Nos.1 to 4, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 22nd December, 2025 cbn 4 116 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 19261 OF 2019 22nd December, 2025 cbn