Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52987 (CHH)

DIPESH KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5101/2023 · 2025-10-06

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:49914 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5101 of 2023 1 - Dipesh Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Ripu Sudan Sahu Aged About 33 Years Posted As Initial Appoint As Ag-3 At Govt. Hr. Se. School Nepani, Block Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rakesh Kumar Rana, S/o Late Shri Deval Singh Rana, Aged About 31 Years Posted As Ag-3 At Govt. Hr. Sec. School Murkhusra, Block Daundilohara, District Balod. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - General Administration Department Chhattisgarh Govt. Through Secretary Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Finance Department Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director Public Education RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Directorate Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension Department Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vidhya Bhusan Soni, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/10/2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant the benefit of incriments to the petitioners of payments from the one years of the appointments. 10.2That any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be granted in favor of the petitioner safeguarding her interest.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition at this juncture. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 3 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat