Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010548732025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 28305/2025 Between: Jd Construction ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKAT SAILENDRA G Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
-2- W.P. No.28305 OF 2025 Date of order: 15.10.2025
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.28305 OF 2025
ORDER
1. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents for non-payment of the bills for the works undertaken by the petitioner.
2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning, and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has executed the work, viz., construction of CC drain at Devapuram 3rd line and Devapuram 1st line approach under 121 Secretariat, 34 ward in AE-1 section under Guntur Municipal Corporation, vide agreement No.509/EE/GMC/GNT/ 2022-23, dt.14.11.2022, as entrusted by the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner duly executed all the works to the satisfaction of the 3rd respondent. It is further submitted that after execution of the works, the competent authority recorded the progress of the work in M Books and final quality assessments were also done by the agency employed by the 3rd respondent and thereafter the petitioner has submitted a final bill for
-3- W.P. No.28305 OF 2025 Date of order: 15.10.2025
a sum of Rs.11,02,171/- and the same was approved by the 3rd respondent, but so far no payment has been made to the petitioner.
5. In reply, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that there is no dispute with respect to the completion of the work undertaken by the petitioner and the payment would be made shortly.
6. Considering the submissions, respondents 2 and 3 are hereby
directed to verify and release the payments due payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
8. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N BV