Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52962 (KAR)

SHRI BHEEMAPPA S/O BALAPPA PUJARI v. THE REGIONAL MANAGER

WP/104852/2022 · 2025-09-19

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12720 WP No. 104852 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.104852 OF 2022 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI. BHEEMAPPA S/O. BALAPPA PUJARI, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: SENIOR ASSOCIATE, R/O. H.NO.20, SAI NILAYA, BEHIND R.S.CERAMICS FACTORY, PRASHANT NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580020, TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL S.DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE REGIONAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE, REGION -1, NETWORK-II, A.O.6, T.S.COMPLES, KESHWAPUR, Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12720 WP No. 104852 of 2022 SOLAPUR ROAD, HUBBALLI-580028, TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, GOKUL ROAD BRANCH, NEAR NEHRU NAGAR WATER TANK, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580030, TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURESH S.GUNDI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO SANCTION THE PENSION AND DISBURSE ALL THE TERMINAL BANDITS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER WITH CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 02.08.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-G AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12720 WP No. 104852 of 2022 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of disposal of W.P.No.147040/2020, nothing further survives for consideration in this petition. Hence, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to take recourse such remedy as available in law including filing a fresh petition, if so advised. Sd/- (S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE EM Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3.1