1 2025:CGHC:51537 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 579 of 2015 Hemant Kumar S/o Late Ram Kurso Nag, Aged About 35 Years Caste Mahra, R/o Village Nagarnar, Tahsil Jagdalpur, Civil And Revenue District Bastar, Chhattisgarh .........Plaintiff, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Boga Died 1.1 - (Deleted) (A) Heeramani As Per Honble Court Order Dated 13-12- 2023. 1.2 - (B) Kalguni D/o Late Boga, Aged About 50 Years R/o Khutipara, Kumharpara, Village Nagarnar, Tahsil Jagdalpur District Bastar, Chhattisgarh 2 - Kana S/o Late Mundiya, Aged About 56 Years R/o Khutipara, Kumharpara, Village Nagarnar, Tahsil Jagdalpur District Bastar, Chhattisgarh, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Bhansingh (Died) Through Legal Heirs As Per Honble Court Order Dated 13-12-2023. 3.1 - (A) Balmati Nag W/o Late Bhansingh Nag Aged About 60 Years R/o Kumhar Para, Nagarnar, Bastar, Nagarnar (C.G.) ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2025.10.16 10:43:51 +0530 2 3.2 - (B) Padam Nath Nag S/o Late Bhansingh Nag Aged About 60 Years R/o Kumhar Para, Nagarnar, Bastar, Nagarnar (C.G.) 4 - In-Charge Officer N.M.D.C. Steel Plant Nagarnar, Tahsil Jagdalpur Bastar, Chhattisgarh, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Bastar, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh ...........Defendants, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Siddharth Rathod, Advocate For Respondent No. 1b, 2 and 3 : Mr. K.P. Sahu, Advocate For Respondent no. 4 : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mrs. Nausheena Ali, Advocate For State/Respondent no. 5 : Mr. Kishanlal Sahu, Deputy Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 14.10.2025 1. After arguing at length, on the submission being made by counsel for respondent no. 4 and 5 that learned both the Courts below have rightly dismissed the suit, learned counsel for appellant would submit that as now the dispute is with regard to apportionment of compensation awarded against the land acquired by respondent no. 5 in favor of respondent no. 4 and the said amount is deposited with the land acquisition officer, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file an application under Section 30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1984. 3 2. In view of submission made by counsel for appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. 3. In the event such application is filed, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the said application in accordance with law, expeditiously. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge alfiza