1 / 2 2025:CGHC:49806 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11437 of 2025 • Parmesh Marik S/o Shri Ganesh Marik Aged About 63 Years R/o Malwiya Nagar, Pondi, Chirmiri, District M.C.B. Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur C.G. 2. Municipal Corporation Chirmiri, Through The Commissioner, Malviya Nagar, West Chirmiri, District M.C.B. (C.G.) 3. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chirmiri, Malviya Nagar, West Chirmiri, District M.C.B. (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Abhyuday Singh, Advocate For Respondent-State For Respondent No. 2 & 3 : : Mr. K.S. Saini, Panel Lawyer Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 07/10/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records of the case. 10.2 It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing the Respondents to consider and grant leave encashment to the petitioner, along with interest, in a time bound manner. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court, may deem fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case.” PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner after attaining age of superannuation stood retire from the post of Asst. Grade. 2 from the office of Respondent No. 2 on 29.02.2024. He contended that after retirement amount due towards leave encashment of Rs. 5,03,552 has not been disbursed to his account till date. Petitioner has submitted representation on 01.09.2025, however, till date representation submitted by petitioner has even not considered and decided. He contended that in the facts of the case, Respondent no. 2 be directed to take decision on the pending representation at the earliest. 3. On due consideration of the submission of learned counsel for petitioner and further that petitioner has already submitted a representation raising grievance before Respondent No. 2, no purpose will be served keeping this writ petition pending, seeking reply from the respondents, it will be expedient in the interest of justice to dispose of this writ petition directing Respondent No. 2 to take decision on the representation. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, directing Respondent No. 2 & 3 to take decision on the pending representation of petitioner dated 01.09.2025 in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a further period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE