Annapureddi Jamalaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/16589/2023 · 2025-12-07
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52960 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52960 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010323452023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16589/2023 Between:
1. ANNAPUREDDI JAMALAIAH,, S/O. PEDDA VENKAIAH, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 8-132, SIVAJI VEEDHI, MYLAVARAM TOWN, KRISHNA (NTR) DISTRICT.
2. ANNAPUREDDI JAMALAIAH BABU @ BABU,, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 10-231/2, SIVAJI VEEDHI, MYLAVARAM TOWN, KRISHNA (NTR) DISTRICT.
3. ANNAPUREDDI JOJIBABU @ JOJI,, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC.
STUDENT, R/O. D. NO. 8-132/1, SIVAJI VEEDHI, MYLAVARAM TOWN, KRISHNA (NTR) DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MYLAVARAM POLICE STATION, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT..
3. KUMARI GUNJI, W/O. GUNJI MAHESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. MYLAVARAM TOWN, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in Registering the Crime in FIR No.225 of 2023, dated 06.06.2023 U/Sec. 447, 506, 509 IPC R/w.156 (3) of Cr.P.C. against the petitioners/Accused 1 to 3 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional an( Principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 16, 21 and 300-A o Constitution of India and consequently Quash the proceedings in FIR No. 225 of 2023 of Mylavaram Police Station, NTR (Krishna) district and pass such pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. AYYAPPA BARIGE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in Registering the Crime in FIR No 225 of 2023, dated 06.06.2023 U/Sec. 447, 506, 509 IPC R/w. 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. against the petitioners/Accused 1 to 3 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and Principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300-A o Constitution of India and consequently, quash the proceedings in FIR No.225 of 2023 of Mylavaram Police Station, NTR (Krishna) district and pass such pass ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that respondent No.3 herein filed a private complaint before the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mylavaram, which is forwarded to respondent police and on receipt of the same, respondent Police registered a case in Crime No.225 of 2023 against A.1 to A.3, who are petitioners herein. Investigation is completed and final report is filed before the Trial Court, and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 08.12.2025
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 16589 of 2023
08.12.2025
Mjl /*