Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Second Bail Application No.105 of 2024
Sonu
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 359 of 2021, under Sections 307, 504 & 506 IPC and 3/25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station I.T.I., District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail. This is second bail application of the applicant. His first bail application was rejected on merits on 05.01.2023.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that there is no new ground to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the third bail application of the applicant deserves to be rejected.
4.
The third bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J) 05.08.2025 Jitendra