AKUMARTHI RAJESH BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/20198/2024 · 2025-11-24
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52942 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52942 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010368022024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20198/2024 Between:
1. AKUMARTHI RAJESH BABU, S/O RAJABABU, AGED 28 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF NEAR RAILWAY STATION, ARUNDATHIPETA, VEDULAPALEM VILLAGE, LANKALAKODERU POST, PALAKOLU MANDAL, W.G. DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAKOLLU RURAL CIRCLE POLICE STATION, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PALAKOLLU RURAL POLICE STATION, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. NAINALA SATYA, D/O DEVAVARAPUSURYANARAYANA, W/O NAINALAPREMKUMAR, AGED 28 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.7- 15-3, BALLAVARI STREET, MARUTHI NAGAR, NARASAPUR TOWN
2
AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. DEVAVARAPU MANI, W/O DEVAVARAPUSURYANARAYANA, HOUSE WIFE, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PALAKOLLU, W.G.
DISTRICT. 8. DEVAVARAPUSWAMY KALYAN, S/ODEVAVARAPUSURYANARAYANA, HOUSE WIFE, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, PALAKOLLU, W.G. DISTRICT. ..RESP
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.2 to 5 especially the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in not registering the FIR basing on the written complaint dt. 12.8.2024 and not taking any action against the respondents 6 to 8 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the BNSS and also violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 14, 19 and Art. 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 4th respondent to register the FIR basing on the complaint of the petitioner dt.
12.8.2024 take appropriate action against the respondents 6 to 8 in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to register the FIR basing on the complaint of the petitioner dt 12.8.2024 and take appropriate action against the respondents 6 to 8 in accordance with law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GOWRI SANKAR CHEEKATLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20198 of 2024 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.2 to 5 especially the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in not registering the FIR basing on the written complaint dt. 12.8.2024 and not taking any action against the respondents 6 to 8 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the BNSS and also violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 14, 19 and Art. 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 4th respondent to register the FIR basing on the complaint of the petitioner dt. 12.8.2024, take appropriate action against the respondents 6 to 8 in accordance with law and pass.…”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.11.2025. UPS
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.20198 of 2024
Dated.25.11.2025
UPS
135