Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52924 (AP)

Sree Jambanna Thatha Divya Samadhi Matam, v. PEDDA ANJINI

CRP/3019/2025 · 2025-11-17

B S Bhanumathi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010595712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the eighteenth The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Civil Revision Petition No: Between: Sree Jambanna Thatha Divya Samadhi Matam and others Pedda Anjini and others Counsel for the petitioner Baggi Venkata Pavan Kumar Counsel for the respondent -NIL- The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) eighteenth day of November two thousand and twenty five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Civil Revision Petition No: 3019 of 2025 Sree Jambanna Thatha Divya Samadhi Matam ...Petitioner and ...Respondents etitioners: Baggi Venkata Pavan Kumar espondents: Court made the following: [3311] two thousand and twenty five Petitioners Respondents 2 C.R.P.No.3019 of 2025 O R D E R: This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners / plaintiffs aggrieved by non-disposal of I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.S.No.167 of 2023 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Rayadurg. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondents / defendants have been proceeding with further encroachments taking advantage of no interim order passed against them and that the petition is ready for enquiry and therefore, it is necessary to decide the same as early as possible. 3. The suit is filed by the petitioners against the respondents for mandatory injunction not to demolish the construction made in the plaint schedule property by the respondents / defendants. Along with the suit, I.A.No.1 of 2023 was filed under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. to grant ad-interim injunction against the respondents restraining them from making further constructions in the suit schedule property until disposal of the suit. So far, no interim order has been passed by the trial Court as per the revision petitioners. If the petition is not heard on merits, the very purpose of filing the petition would be defeated. Therefore, it is a fit case to dispose of the revision petition with suitable directions to the trial Court. 4. In the result, the revision petition is allowed. The trial Court is directed to dispose of I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.S.No.167 of 2023 pending on its file as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, not later than three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ B. S. BHANUMATHI, J Dt.18.11.2025 Note: Issue C.C. by 19.11.2025 B/o PNV