- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14977 WP No. 108247 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 108247 OF 2014 (S-RES) BETWEEN: DR. CHANDRAMA KANAGALI REGISTRAR AGE: 59 YEARS, KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SEEMA SHIVA NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HIGHER EDUDCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR DR. H.B.WALIKAR AGE:63,KARNATAKA UNIVERISTY DHARWAD R/BY 3. THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATION) DR. H.T.POTHE, AGE: 49,KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY, DHARWAD. 4. THE DEAN, FACULTY OF LAW, DR. C.RAJASEKHAR, AGE: 60,KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY, DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP; SRI. VENKATESH M. KHARVI, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. K.L.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R4-SERVED) Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14977 WP No. 108247 of 2014 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO: 1. ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE RESOLUTION AND THE ENQUIRY COMMITTEE FORMED DATED 01/08/2014 AT RESOLUTION NO.30 AND CONSEQUENT FURTHER ACTION, PURSUANT TO THE RESOLUTION, AS SHOWN IN ANNEXURE-H BEARING NO.KU-SYNDICATE/PROCEDINGS2014-15/776 AND ANNEXURE-J BEARING NO.PÀ««/¹D¸ÀÄ«/²PÀëPÉÃvÀgÀ/ PÀ««/¹D¸ÀÄ«/²PÀëPÉÃvÀgÀ/ PÀ««/¹D¸ÀÄ«/²PÀëPÉÃvÀgÀ/ PÀ««/¹D¸ÀÄ«/²PÀëPÉÃvÀgÀ/4/2014/1996 TO THE WRIT PETITION. 2. TO DECLARE THE MINUTES OF THE SYNDICATE MEETING HELD ON 01-08-2014 AS PREPARED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT AT THE BEHEST OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT NO.4 AS IN CHARGE - REGISTRAR DATED 01/08/2014 AS PER ANNEXURE-K NO.KVCS/NOTE/REG/2014-15 AS ILLEGAL AND CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE KSU ACT, 2000. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARINGIN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition is rendered infructuous due to efflux of time. 2. The submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RHR/- CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 150