MRK,J WP.NO.22178 of 2016 APHC010771172016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22178 OF 2016 Between: 1. Malladi Venkata Ravindra Varma,, S/o Naga Raju, Aged about 29 years, Hand Holding Person/Computer Operator 0/o Revenue Divisional Officer, Eluru, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad - 500 022 2. The District Collector, West Godavari at Eluru. West Godavari District - 534 001 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Eluru, West Godavari District - 534 001 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of andamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not continuing the petitioner as Hand Holding Person/Computer Operator in the Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Eluru without passing any orders of termination and not paying salary from May, 2014 to February, 2015 is wholly MRK,J WP.NO.22178 of 2016 illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and further declare that the petitioner is entitled to be continued in service as Hand Holding Person/Computer Operator with all consequential benefits IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 27269 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 5-11-2015 Counsel for the Petitioner: Malladi Venkata Ravindra Varma Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (AP) MRK,J WP.NO.22178 of 2016 The Court made the following ORDER: 1. On 24.09.2025, this Court passed the following order: “No representation on both sides. Post the matter after Dusshera Vacation, 2025.” 2. On 29.10.2025, this Court passed the following order: “It is represented across the Bar that learned counsel for the petitioner has given up vakalath. Registry is directed to print the name of the petitioner in the Cause list. Post on 31.10.2025 under the caption for dismissal.” 3. On 31.10.2025, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner. Registry is directed to comply the order dated 29.10.2025 in W.P.No.22178 of 2016. List the matter next week.” 4. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or by a counsel. 5. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 07.11.2025 Dvs MRK,J WP.NO.22178 of 2016 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 57 WRIT PETITION No.22178 of 2016 Date: 07.11.2025 Dvs