IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 1304 CWP-17247-2010 (O Avtar Singh Kanungo CWP-6640-201 Kewal Krishan CWP-21880-2010 (O&M) Satwantbir Singh Kanungo vs. State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN Present: None Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Arora, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 to 20 in CWP *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the seniority list dated 19.02.2009, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. Learned State counsel refers to para 5 of the preliminary submission of counter affidavit filed on behalf of Depu Collector, dated 12.11.2010 to state that in appeal dated 04.06.2010 District Collector, Ferozepur, to has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 20 in CWP states that all the 4. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner by demonstrating that the 5. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected 26.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 2010 (O&M) Kanungo and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2011 (O&M) Kewal Krishan and another vs. State of Punjab and others 2010 (O&M) Singh Kanungo vs. State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN None for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Arora, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 to 20 in CWP *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the seniority list dated 19.02.2009, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned State counsel refers to para 5 of the preliminary submission of counter affidavit filed on behalf of Depu Collector, dated 12.11.2010 to state that in appeal dated 04.06.2010, had set aside the impugned District Collector, Ferozepur, to prepare afresh has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 20 in CWP the private respondents have since retired. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner by demonstrating that the lis still survives. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 26.05.2025 and others vs. State of Punjab and others vs. State of Punjab and others Singh Kanungo vs. State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Arora, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 to 20 in CWP-17247-2010. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the seniority list dated 19.02.2009, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned State counsel refers to para 5 of the preliminary submission of counter affidavit filed on behalf of Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Collector, dated 12.11.2010 to state that in appeal, the Commissioner, vide order impugned seniority list with a direction to the prepare afresh and as such, the present petition Learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 20 in CWP-17247-2010 respondents have since retired. Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived, Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected files. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the seniority list Learned State counsel refers to para 5 of the preliminary submission District vide order seniority list with a direction to the the present petition 2010 with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.26 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document