1 26-Aapl655.18 +1.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO.655 OF 2018 [Anup Niranjan Dodiya and others .vs. State of Maharashtra and one] WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO.654 OF 2018 [Anup Niranjan Dodiya and others .vs. State of Maharashtra and one] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Ved Deshpande, Advocate for Applicants. Shri Amit Chutke, APP for Respondent No.1/State. Shri Abdul Subhan, Advocate for Respondent No.2 in APL 655/2018. Shri Nilesh Borkar, Advocate holding for Shri S.D. Chopde, Advocate for Respondent No.2 in APL 654/2018. .................. CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : APRIL 28, 2025 . P.C. 1. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor points out that in the present matter chargesheet has been filed. Thereupon, the learned counsel for the applicants seeks permission to amend the application. However, considering the fact that the chargesheet and the record is bulky and the applicants will require to even raise additional grounds to challenge the chargesheet, we are of the opinion that if the liberty to file afresh is granted that would suffice the purpose. 2. Moreover, Shri Nilesh Borkar, learned counsel for respondent no.2-Complainant makes a statement that if such application is filed, he would waive the notice, if the copies supplied in advance to him. 2025:BHC-NAG:4421-DB 2 26-Aapl655.18 +1.odt 3. In that view of the matter, both the applications stand disposed of with liberty to file afresh, raising a challenge to the chargesheet, if applicants so desire. (PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) Gulande