APHC010574982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 32234/2025 Between: 1. YERUVA SAI HEMANTH REDDY, S/O. SIVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC SOFTWARE EMPLOYEE R/O. H. NO. 4-32-188, SHAPUR NAGAR, QUTUBULLAPUR, JEEDIMETLA, MEDCHAL DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE. 2. YERUVA ROOPA REDDY,, D/O. SIVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC SOFTWARE EMPLOYEE R/O. H. NO. 4-32-188, SHAPUR NAGAR, QUTUBULLAPUR, JEEDIMETLA, MEDCHAL DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MARKAPUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. KUNDURU ADINARAYANAMMA, W/O AVULA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O RAYAVARAM VILLAGE MARKAPUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. K CHIRANJEEVI, TAHSILDAR, MARKAPUR MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring 2 the proceedings in Rcc/622/2025 dt. 15-10-2025 alleged to have been passed by the 4th respondent, whereunder the petitioners land to an extent of Ac. 3.33 Cents in Sy. No. 156/2 and Ac. 0.40 Cents in Sy. No. 156/1, alleged to have been resumed in favor of the government and without following due process of law, and without enquiry is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of the alleged proceedings in Rcc/622/2025 dt. 15-10-2025 said to have been passed by the 4th respondent, whereunder the petitioners land to an extent of Ac. 3.33 Cents in Sy. No. 156/2 & Ac. 0.40 Cents in Sy. No. 156/1, where under alleged to have been resumed the land in favor of the government, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the proceedings in Rcc/622/2025 dt. 15-10-2025 alleged to have been passed by the 4th respondent, whereunder the petitioners land to an extent of Ac. 3.33 Cents in Sy. No. 156/2 & Ac. 0.40 Cents in Sy. No. 156/1, alleged to have been resumed in favor of the government pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to file fresh Writ Petition challenging the order of the Tahsildar dated 15.10.2025. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh Writ Petition challenging the order of the Tahsildar dated 15.10.2025. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 08.12.2025 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.32234 OF 2025 08.12.2025 RD