APHC010630022023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32854/2023 Between: KARAVADI MOHAN RAO, S/O MADHAVARAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YRS, R/O. D.NO. 7-452, M.M. ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR, LAWYER PET(O) PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.- 523002 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONGOLE TALUKA POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. 4. K AMARNATH, S/O SHANKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 1-112, S/O NIDAMANURI HARIBABU, GOLLAPALEM COLONY, INKOLLU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents particularly the respondent No. 3 herein with regard to registration of FIR and to take initiate necessary action against the 4th respondent. In spite of receipt of petitioners written complaint 20.11.2023 and the 2 same was endorsed to the respondents 2 and 3 given on for necessary action as illegal, arbitrary, irrational, unconstitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and to consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register F.I.R against the 4th respondent herein to take necessary action and to do the investigation in to it expeditiously as early as possible.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that there is a civil suit in O.S.No.96 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Ongole is pending between the parties. It is further submitted that the contents of the complaint given by the Petitioner in Spandana, are of civil nature. As such, the Police have not registered any case based on the said complaint. 3. Sri Somisetty Ganesh Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32854 of 2023 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh