Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52875 (AP)

KESA VENKATA PRAKASH MADHAVA RAO v. Sri. Peeyush Kuamr, IAS.,

CC/2939/2025 · 2025-11-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010527382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2939/2025 Between: 1. KESA VENKATA PRAKASH MADHAVA RAO, S/O KESA RAGAVULU, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC. AGP, RESIDENT OF 20B-4-24, NAMI VEERASALINGAM STREET, 44TH DIVISION, KOTHAPETA, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PEEYUSH KUAMR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI CHENNAKESAVULU, THE DEPUTY PAY AND ACCOUNT OFFICER, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, BRANCH VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors by invoking the provisions of sections 10 to 12 of the contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by taking appropriate steps as per Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 in accordance with law, for wilful wanton and deliberate disobedience of the orders of the Honble Court dated 08.05.2025 in W.P No.6965 of 2025 in the interest of Justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELURU SESHA MAHESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 08.05.2025 passed in W.P.No.6965 of 2025. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 08.05.2025 passed in W.P.No.6965 of 2025 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.11.2025 TVN 35 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.2939 OF 2025 Date: 22.11.2025 TVN