Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52873 (AP)

A C JAYALAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/10162/2023 · 2025-11-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010196912023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10162/2023 Between: A C Jayalakshmi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 3. GP FOR REVENUE 4. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following order: The short grievance of the petitioner is that the 9th respondent is digging private bore well in the middle of the public road that is connecting Adoni to Yemmiganur, adjacent to R.S.No.444/B2 of Mandagiri village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnook District. 2. Heard Sri MRK.Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Chandrasekhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. Sri Chandrasekhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue on instructions dated 29.11.2025 submitted that as per the survey record, the bore well point is existing in Sy.No.173 of Adoni Revenue village but not in R.S.No.444/B2 of Mandagiri village, Adoni mandal, as alleged by the petitioner. As such there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the writ petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner requested to record the said instructions and prayed to close the writ petition. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that as per the survey record, the bore well point is existing in Sy.No.173 of Adoni Revenue village but not in R.S.No.444/B2 of Mandagiri village, Adoni mandal, as alleged by the petitioner, there remains nothing for adjudication and writ petition is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS