Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 52872 (BOM)
MS. SUJATA D/O NAMDEO MASRAM v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NAGPUR OFFICE AT CHAONI SADAR NAGPUR AND ANOTHER
WP/812/2021 · 2025-10-15
Shri Anil L Pansare, Shri Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52872 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52872 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
923 wp 812-2021.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 812/2021 Ms. Sujata d/o Namdeo Masram Vs. Commissioner of Police Nagpur Office at Chaoni, Sadar, Nagpur and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri S.A. Ashirgade, Addl.PP for respondent Nos.1 and 2/State CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 15.10.2025
1. None present for petitioner.
2. The petitioner is seeking direction to respondent No.2 to register First Information Report, as per the complaint and the statement made by the petitioner.
3. Learned Addl.P.P. submits that the offence is registered.
4. Thus, the purpose of filing petition has been served. That appears to be the reason why nobody is appearing for the petitioner.
5. The petition is accordingly dismissed as not prosecuted.
(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) R.S. Sahare