Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52867 (AP)

V.SUBRAHMANYAM, SPSR NELLORE DIST v. PRL SECY, MUN ADMN & UD DEPT, HYD & ANOTHER

WP/14647/2014 · 2025-12-29

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010116732014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION N WP.No.14647/2014 Between: V.subrahmanyam, Spsr Nellore Dist Prl Secy Mun Admn Ud Dept Hyd Another and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K ANANDA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 2. B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL MC) WP.No.36289 of 2014 Between: Kommuru Sudhakara Rao and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 3. K ANANDA RAO The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION Nos.14647/2014 and 36289 of 2014 V.subrahmanyam, Spsr Nellore Dist AND Prl Secy Mun Admn Ud Dept Hyd Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL MC) Kommuru Sudhakara Rao and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N and 36289 of 2014 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION Nos.14647 and 36289 of 2014 COMMON ORDER : 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners lodged complaints regarding the unauthorized construction undertaken by the unofficial respondents. 2. It is further submitted that the unofficial respondents in WP.No.36289 of 2014 had earlier filed WP.No.14647 of 2014, aggrieved by the action of the respondents in interfering with the construction activity, wherein this Court granted statusquo in WP.No.14647 of 2014. 3. Thereafter, it is submitted that the petitioner in WP.No.14647 of 2014 passed away, and as per the instructions submitted by the learned standing counsel for the Eluru Municipal Corporation, ever since the demise of the writ petitioner, the subject premises has remained locked and unused. 4. Recording the submissions, both the writ petitions are closed. No costs As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 3 200 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION Nos.14647 and 36289 of 2014 Dated 30.12.2025 KGM