SMT LAXMI DEVI W/O THIMAPPA v. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
WP/107732/2023 · 2025-09-26
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52862 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52862 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13545 WP No. 107732 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 107732 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. LAXMI DEVI W/O THIMAPPA AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. YADPI VILLAGE, TALUK AND DISTRICT. BALLARI.
2.
YERRAMMA W/O GADI LINGAPPA AGE. 45 YEARS, R/O. GOLBAL VILLAGE, TALUK SIRUGUPPA, DISTRICT. BALLARI.
3.
K THIPPESWAMY S/O LATE SAKREGOUDA @ SAKREPPA AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. YADPI VILLAGE, TALUK AND DISTRICT. BALLARI.
4.
K SANNA THIPPESWAMY S/O LATE SAKREGOUDA @ SAKREPPA AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. YADPI VILLAGE, TALUK AND DISTRICT. BALLARI. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. GAYATRI S.R., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE LAND TRIBUNAL BALLARI TALUK, BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT-583101.
3.
THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, LAND REFORMS, BALLARI DISTRICT-583101.
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13545 WP No. 107732 of 2023
4.
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR BALLARI, DISTRICT. BALLARI-583101. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12.10.1988 PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL IN REV/LRM/INAM CASE NO.
57/113/84-85 WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E & ETC.
THIS WP COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 09.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
GAB, CT:VP LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 9