APHC010371622024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3538/2024 Between: 1. SRI DASTAGIR SAB @ SAHAIK DASTAGIRI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 4-144, EGUVA NADIPEPALLI VILLAGE, MUDRAMDODDI POST, V KOTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT V PARVATHIAMMA, Tahsildar V Kota Mandal, Chittoor District. Andhra Pradesh State. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act. 1971 for wilfully, deliberately and violating the orders passed by the Honble Sri Justice SUBBA REDDY SATTI in W.P No. 10018 of 2024, Dated 29.04.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case was filed, complaining of a violation of the order dated 29.04.2024, passed in W.P. No. 10018 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the inaction of Tahsildar, V Kota Mandal, in considering the representation dated 06.01.2023, as illegal and arbitrary. 4. The said writ petition was disposed of on 29.04.2024. The operative portion of said order reads as under: “In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, without going into other aspects of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file application under Form- VIA of the Rules, 1989 before the 4th respondent. On receipt of such application, the 4th respondent shall follow the procedure i.e. issuance of notices to persons interested and affected etc., and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.” 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleaded that the petitioner made an F-line application instead of Form-VIA on 02.08.2024. The Village Surveyor issued notice under Section 23 of the Surveys & Boundaries Act, 1923. The Village Surveyor measured the land; however, not furnished the report and thus, violated the order dated 29.04.2024. 6. A counter-affidavit was filed by the respondent. Along with the counter- affidavit, an endorsement dated 09.09.2024 was also filed. 7. A perusal of the endorsement dated 09.09.2024, this Court is of the considered opinion that the respondent has not violated the order dated 29.04.2024, passed in W.P. No. 10018 of 2024, and the contempt case is liable to be dismissed. 8. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 05.12.2025 TVN 158 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.3538 OF 2024 Date: 05.12.2025 TVN