IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 743 of 2025 Decided on: 10.01.2025 Veena Thakur & others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioners: Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed representation (Annexure P-7) with the respondent–Department and this petition be disposed of by directing the Competent Authority to take appropriate decision thereupon within some time bond period. 3. This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction that the representation filed by the petitioners be decided by the Competent Authority in light of the averments made therein within a period of eight weeks from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?