N HARINATH BABU v. COMMANDER CHALLA VENKATESWAR (RETD.,)
CC/4635/2023 · 2025-11-21
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52856 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52856 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010372692023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4635/2023 Between:
1. N HARINATH BABU, S/O. Y. RAM MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 62 YRS, OCC. GP'C'(MTS), RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT VIDYAPEETHA, NOW NATIONAL SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT R/U H.NU. 10-13-486A, REDDY COLONY, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. COMMANDER CHALLA VENKATESWAR RETD, S/o Challa Panduranga Vittala Sharma, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Registrar, Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha, (Now) National Sanskrit University, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon, prosecute and punish the Respondent under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for Wilful, deliberate violation of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court, dt.25-04-2023 in IA No.01/2023 in Writ Petition No.6076/2020 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. PASALA PONNA RAO The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.4635 of 2023
ORDER:
This Court in W.P.No.6076 of 2020 passed an interim order dated 25.04.2023, directing the respondents to refer the issue to the grievances redressal committee.
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that respondents have referred the issue to the grievance redressal committee and the redressal committee has
disposed of the representation made by the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that aggrieved by the order passed by the redressal committee, fresh writ petition has been filed. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
3. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 22.11.2025 KBN
3
51 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Contempt Case No.4635 of 2025
22.11.2025 KKBBNN