CHANDOLU SURYA PRAKASH RAO v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/24579/2021 · 2025-11-23
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52853 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52853 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010398552021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24579/2021 Between:
1. CHANDOLU SURYA PRAKASH RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 3-132, SHIRIDI SAI MANDIR ROAD, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, SATTENAPAILI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PIDIGURALLA POLICE STATION, PIDIGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
5. VANKAYALA GOPI, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. OPP. ANDHRA BANK ROAD, NEAR YELLA RAO HOUSE, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P., 522 413.
6. NEERUMALLA SURENDRA KUMAR, S/O. VISWANADHAM, C/O.
MALLIKARJUNA OILS AND DRY FRUITS, MAIN ROAD, OPP. CHAITANYA GODAVARI BANK, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
7. ATUKURI RAMA MOHAN RAO, S/O. VENKATA GURUBRAHMA HARI LINGESWARA RAO, R/O. OPP. HANUMAN BOOK SHOP, JANAPADU ROAD, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
8. KAKUMANU AMARESWARA RAO
RAJA, S/O. LAKSHMINARAYANA, R/O. NEAR MUNICIPAL OFFICE, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
9. ATUKURI UPENDRA KUMAR, S/O. VENKATA GURUBRAHMA HARI LINGESWARA RAO, C/O. VIJAYA KRISHNA FANCY, NEAR
2
CHURCH MAIN ROAD, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
10. ATUKURI ANANTHA NAGA LAKSHMI, W/O. UPENDRA KUMAR, C/O. VIJAYA KRISHNA FANCY, NEAR CHURCH MAIN ROAD, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not registering the crime against the unofficial respondents in pursuance of my complaint dated 15-09-2021 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Arts. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to register a case against the unofficial respondents in pursuance of my complaint dated 15-09-2021 and pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KASI KONDA REDDY YENUMULA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. SESHAGIRI RAO ULLAM
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ .. to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not registering the crime against the unofficial respondents in pursuance of my complaint dated 15-09-2021 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Arts. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to register a case against the unofficial respondents in pursuance of my complaint dated 15-09- 2021 and pass such ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that during the course of investigation, the Investigating Officer found that the matter is purely civil in nature and hence, no crime is registered against the unofficial respondents and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are
directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh