Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 52848 (BOM)
SANDIP PANDURANG UGALE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF COOPERATION, MARKETING AND TEXTILE, MUMBAI
WP/4494/2021 · 2025-05-07
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52848 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52848 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 537.wp.4494.21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4494/2021 Sandip Pandurang Ugale and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R. D. Karode, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. N. S. Rao, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4/State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 07/05/2025.
1. In spite of the objections being notified and sufficient chances being granted, the objections are not removed.
2. As such, by way of last chance, we grant time of six weeks to remove office objections.
3. Failure to remove office objections will entail the dismissal of the petition without further reference to the Court.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule