APHC010173742022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10871/2022 Between: 1. SUDA NAGESH, S/O.SUBBA RAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.2-4-109-1, NEAR PBC COLONY, MUDDANUR ROAD, PULIVENDULA POST AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE S H O, PULIVENDULA URBAN P.S, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 5. CHAWA SRINIVASULA REDDY, S/O. CHAWA ROSI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-4-276, SREE RAMA THEATRE ROAD, PULIVEDNULA POST AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 herein in calling the petitioner to the police station at the behest of unofficial respondent No. 5 herein and threatening the petitioner to withdraw the suit and vacate the. suit schedule property pending the suit in O.S.No.116/2020 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District, otherwise threatening the petitioner to implicate in false criminal cases and thereby causing interference in the personal liberty and civil disputes, as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 2 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes pending in O.S.No.116/2020 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District or in any manner, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 herein not to call the petitioners to the police station or in any manner interfere in the civil disputes pending in O.S.No.116/2020 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District at the behest of unofficial respondent No.5 including the personal life and liberty of the petitioner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 herein in calling the petitioner to the police station at the behest of unofficial respondent No. 5 herein and threatening the petitioner to withdraw the suit and vacate the. suit schedule property pending the suit in O.S.No.116/2020 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District, otherwise threatening the petitioner to implicate in false criminal cases and thereby causing interference in the personal liberty and civil disputes, as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes pending in O.S.No.116/2020 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Pulivendula, YSR Kadapa District or in any manner, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that respondent Police are calling the petitioner to the Police Station and interfering in the civil disputes. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State on written instructions would submit that no crime is registered against the petitioner and respondent Police never called him to the Police Station and never interfered in the civil disputes and this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 4 In the light of the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except following due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 10871 of 2022 04.11.2025 Mjl /*